Gasoline Mid size 5-seater SUV Toyota Venza

There are some differences between the front design of the Toyota venza Gasoline Car and the Lingfang, but the contours of the body and rear are basically similar. I personally love its side lines and rear design.

In the interior, the overall materials and workmanship of the venza Sedan Car are indeed more exquisite than those of the Velanda, with a significantly stronger sense of luxury. But if you compare it with domestic brand models, it looks very average. In addition, what needs to be roast is that the central screen of the low configuration model of venza has been deliberately reduced, showing the form of "screen in screen", so you can see that the screen frame is very wide, and you can park several aircraft carriers. In addition, even for high-end models, the color performance and clarity of the screen are very average, which is clearly behind this era. However, the response speed of its entire system is still good, at least it won't get stuck.

In terms of configuration, the basic configuration of venza SUV Car is relatively complete, but compared to domestic brands in the same price range, it appears relatively shabby. Additionally, what I personally dislike is the lack of support for Carplay.

The seats of GAC Toyota venza are quite good, with no issues with the length of the seat cushion, filling of the seat cushion material, wrapping, etc. The backrest angle of the rear seats can also be adjusted to a relatively flat position. Its overall space is not a problem for household use, but it is relatively average and cannot be said to be very abundant.

In addition, the trunk space of the venza is also moderate, but its trunk platform height is slightly higher, which is clearly not as good as the RAV4 Rongfang and Honda CR-V.

The two wheel drive version of our test drive is equipped with a combination of a 2.0L engine and a CVT. Its absolute power can be said to be at the reciprocal level nowadays, but fortunately, the CVT gearbox is well matched: with a positive throttle response, its power response speed is very fast when driving in cities, and it can quickly give you power whether overtaking or accelerating, so you don't feel that the power is insufficient at this time. In addition, the CVT transmission is very smooth (slightly better than Honda's new CR-V's 1.5T+CVT), giving you the feeling of driving a pure electric vehicle (of course, the power response is not that fast).

Of course, when the speed exceeds 80km/h, the weak weakness will be exposed, and the sustained acceleration ability at high speeds will be significantly reduced.

The overall sound insulation level of venza is quite good, at an average level, and its insulation against tire noise and wind noise is also good. In addition, the noise control of the engine is also very good when driving at low speeds. However, due to the limitation of the engine displacement, if you have some requests for high power, the engine speed will often increase to over 3000 rpm, which will increase some noise, but it is no less than that of the Velanda and RAV4 Rongfang.

The chassis texture of the venza is very good, and it can handle all vibrations in one go, without any aftershocks or lateral sway inside the car. The flexibility of its chassis is also good, providing a certain sense of luxury, which is clearly better than the Velanda and better than its Japanese brand competitors, Honda CR-V and Nissan Qijun, and even not inferior to European brand models. Even compared to its corresponding Lexus model NX200, the overall chassis performance of the venza is not inferior.

In addition, the steering wheel feel of venza is also quite good, quite delicate, but slightly heavy.

The driving conditions for our test drive this time were mainly in a smooth urban environment, with almost no congestion, only some traffic lights. Its actual fuel consumption is between 7.5L and 8.5L per 100 kilometers, which is not bad for gasoline SUV models, but it definitely cannot be compared to hybrid models.